Fri, Aug 25 at 9:18 AM Let. # To: Jeff Olivet | Helene Schneider, Jerome Johnson “
Concerning the matter of topic for our Tuesday, August 29th Zoom session at Noon PCT and 3:00 pm EST for 30 minutes, I believe that we must have in clear understanding of this discussion, its meaning, what realistically and imperatively must be achieved, particularly as it relates to black citizen’s homelessness.
Remember.
On numerous, recorded occasions, we cited that such bequeathed authorities mandated in the January 1, 1863, President Abraham Lincoln Executive Order of the Emancipation Proclamation Sentence 2, B. and 5, specifically, conjointly and separately orders the “Executive Government (Republican Form – Art.4. Sec. 4, US Const.), and the military, etc., mandating…
“…will recognize and maintain the freedom of such persons, and will do no act or acts to repress such persons, or any of them, in any efforts they may make for their actual freedom”, adding “as is enjoyed by white citizens”, (Section 1, 1866 Civil Rights Act)
Second, in our last communication, we mutually agreed that our questions, requests, and propositions for comprehensive, humane, i.e., non-military enforcement of homeless, US citizens “into permanent, “huge tent cities” of no return, even as pronounced by former, President, the Hon. Donald Trump (#45), dating back to that initial, July 27, 2022 proclamation, and is now a central portion of 20254 anti-crime platforms, was “above your pay grade” to address.
The two matters requested of you were/are:
1. Executive Order forbidding military enforcement of homelessness, and that Order sent to Capital Hill for permanent legislation against the “loophole” in the national security.
2. As 30 minute zoom session, emails, etc., are highly inefficient for addressing these deep, complex, sensitive matters, you were requested to arrange for my team to visit DC, i.e., the White House, for hours, even days of close quarter, in person discussions.
This federal law doesn’t say that the President, or the military must agree with our our “any efforts”, but simple “will do no act or act to repress” while recognizing and maintaining the freedom of such persons.
Well, along with several other Biden Administration acts, this denial, is just that.
“Sadly, this resistance, even to the President, taking our recommended actions against the Trump military enforced, relocation option, is beginning to appear as political, social status, and alarmingly, systemic, if not out-right anti-economically poor, black man racism against myself, and my undefended American African, federal black citizen-peoples.
Such is also puzzling that your superiors, the Hon. Susan Rice, Ms. Valeri Jarrett, and former President, the Hon. Barach H. Obama, et al, who are supposedly black, or at least representing themselves as such to us who are, have thus far rejected our non-money-oriented appeals. Very strange behavior indeed!”
Perhaps, in the future, as matters continue to worsen we can have that arrangement.
The Unleashing of the Military Force Against Civilian, Societal Caused Maladies
In 2008, the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2008 struck much of the existing text in section 1076.
That same section: The revised section of the law, section 1068 had one amended section that had multiple parts with the same exact text. These sections (as amended, and bolded to show the similar parts) read as follows:
Sec. 333. Interference with State and Federal law
The President, by using the militia, or the armed forces, or both, or by any other means, shall take such measures as he considers necessary to suppress, in a State, any insurrection, domestic violence, unlawful combination, or conspiracy, if it–
(1) so hinders the execution of the laws of that State, and of the United States within the State, that any part or class of its people is deprived of a right, privilege, immunity, or protection named in the Constitution and secured by law, and the constituted authorities of that State are unable, fail, or refuse to protect that right, privilege, or immunity, or to give that protection; or
(2) opposes or obstructs the execution of the laws of the United States or impedes the course of justice under those laws.
In any situation covered by clause (1), the State shall be considered to have denied the equal protection of the laws secured by the Constitution.”
Defense Support of Civilian Law Enforcement Agencies was enacted on April 5, 2018, under Mr. Trump.
Of course, there is so much more bearing out the legitimacy of our assertions and concerns, which we can later discuss in detail, that is, if you are willing.
Finally, please give us your response ASAP, as we must prepare for whatever eventuality comes from your response.
Thanks kindly for your attentiveness,
Ted HayesJusticeville – EXODUS II
Agape-Shalom